this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
41 points (90.2% liked)
Open Source
32641 readers
951 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They literally go out of their way to tell you they aren't.
They are what's called "Source-First" according to their own terminology
One of the things they say in that blog post that I think misses the point is that OSI-approved licenses don't "fail to protect the developer", they are literally built to pass the rights of the developer to the user, where they belong. Open source protects the user, full stop. The side effect of this is that corps can take advantage as they are also users - and this is why I personally fight so hard for the GPL license as it does prevent big corps from taking and not giving back.
FUTO is "Source-First" until they switch to a license that prioritizes the user over the developer. I believe the FUTO company's public image is of service to their users, which is fantastic, we need more of that, but their license only reflects that partially.