this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
45 points (94.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2248 readers
1343 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a small Seattle suburb, a rape investigation sparks a war over speech and power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cypher 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He’d submitted the kit to the Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory in March 2019, according to the crime lab report. Lux began emailing Bruton as early as that July demanding answers and accusing police officers of lying to her. Bruton replied that the results could take anywhere from six to nine months on average to come back.

The article paints the picture that Lux was immediately hostile to investigators and had a pre-existing notion that those in authority were out to get her.

I doubt the investigation was perfect, as basically none are, but their effort seems reasonable.

Based on the scant details in the article Im not convinced this wasn’t a medical event, as there’s no solid evidence of an attacker.

[–] Dkarma 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it's not like cops are trained liars with immunity for their lies...

Get fucked.

[–] Cypher 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So you believe the cops were lying about how long the test results take?

https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-rape-kits-are-awaiting-testing-in-the-us-see-the-data-by-state/

Get fucked.

The rules on the sidebar are quite short, I recommend you follow them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Results shouldn't take this long, the victim is being completely reasonably pissed.

[–] Cypher 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hardly justifies abusing people such as the clerk who have no power to resolve the issue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Alright, so they collectively threw up their hands, and instead of devoting resources to help this traumatized person they prosecuted her instead.

Don't tell me they couldn't do anything when they did something.

[–] Cypher 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They seemingly exhausted avenues of investigation and when that was inconclusive they were forced to seek intervention against a person harassing numerous staff members.

They did something, against a person whom could be positively identified snd their actions proved beyond a doubt. Your position is a false equivalence.

Edit: also you seem to be suggesting that individuals including the clerk had power to perform some action but instead chose to sue. This is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mayor Katherine Ross and Police Chief Brian Lynch were both there at the hearing, supporting the clerk

Lux believes police botched the investigation, pointing to lost evidence, unpursued leads, and the involvement of an officer who’d been suspended for shoddy follow-through on sexual assault cases.

The mayor and police chief have the power here, to either address the issues in their police department on a policy level or by investigating the officer that's bad at his job. Did they do anything?

[–] Cypher 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If you read the article first you would know

Snoqualmie police say they’ve already investigated, and even had an outside agency review the case to double check their work

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I did

They covered their butts instead of offering a traumatised woman services.

I know the answer is "it doesn't work like that", and I'm saying it should work like that.

[–] Cypher 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes I suppose all police and council members, staff and dispatchers should drop everything for the forseeable future to deal with a case which has little evidence and no prime suspect.

Otherwise they should expect 24/7 harrassment from a nut job.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why not just... Have case workers that are the main point of contact, and they manage access to services for these people? Encourage trauma therapy, etc?

It's pretty clear this woman was drugged, and she made it home, got hurt and shit everywhere. She needed empathy.

But no, if you can't get a criminal apparently the Justice system has no function. That's broken.

[–] Cypher 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yea the kind of person that calls dispatch a dozen times a day ranting about conspiracies isn’t going to magically start being reasonable because they have the phone number for a case worker.

It's pretty clear this woman was drugged

Toxicology results do not support this claim.

got hurt and shit everywhere

Last time I got hurt and shit everywhere I didn’t harass innocent people for years about it.

Mental illness is almost certainly at play here and I would be completely unsurprised if the alleged victim were diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar.

Also it’s a justice system not a fucking therapy system.

She needed empathy.

She needs a straight jacket and a bed pan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

You know what would be justice? The case worker getting them a diagnosis.

Toxicology results

“I reviewed the results but did not see anything of concern,” Bruton wrote in the police report, without noting what drugs were tested or if any came back positive.

So a non doctor decided that the result was negative, and not inconclusive. Some drugs will not test positive after a short time frame. People use these drugs for that purpose.

A case worker being the primary contact, would explain this and funnel people into the care they actually need. If you don't want this, you don't want society to take care of it's citizens.