133
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
133 points (96.5% liked)
Texas
1475 readers
837 users here now
A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas
Other Texas Lemmy Communties to follow
Sports
- Houston Astros
- Houston Texans
- Houston Rockets
- Texas Rangers
- Dallas Cowboys
- Dallas Stars
- Austin FC
- San Antonio Spurs
Rules (Subject to Change)
-
Be a Decent Human Being
-
Posting news articles: Please use exact article Titles
-
Posts must have something to do with Texas
-
Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
-
No NSFW content
-
Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Being the details aren't known, it's hard to know if the mother knew it was a non viable pregnancy, if she received prenatal care, etc.
This is what the majority votes for, unfortunately....which includes many women.
Per the article:
Finally:
What a horribly callous response from someone who obviously didn't read the article. What was the purpose of your comment and speculation?
This is such a cold editorial just further isolating someone who probably already feels lost and possibly alone in her situation.
Also from the article:
As long as we're gonna jump to conclusions, I'd venture a guess that as a young person working in public health in the most liberal city in this backwards state, she's probably not one of those women. Either way, pro-abortion or pro-life, I don't think "random infant death" was on the ballot. Yes, women's health was delivered a huge blow, but it's not the opinion of the majority.
Very well said, thank you. Too many people see this and think "Tough, but them's the rules" without consideration to the damage this family suffered, and that others in this state will also suffer unless things change.