this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5646 readers
504 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
14
Trump nominates Neil Jacobs to head NOAA (www.axios.com)
submitted 20 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Commerce Department agency is one of the globe's top climate science agencies, funding research and keeping track of global temperatures in near real-time.

...

Multiple sources told Axios on condition of anonymity that DOGE representatives were at NOAA's facilities in Silver Spring, Md., on Tuesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zildjiandrummer1 1 points 14 hours ago

All things said and done, this isn't the worst pick I've seen in this hellscape administration. I was fully expecting an Exxon CEO or something. It's still extremely worrying how easy Jacobs can throw away any scientific integrity for Trump's loyalty (e.g. Sharpiegate).