this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
595 points (98.2% liked)

Comic Strips

13692 readers
3573 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source unknown, some sites assign it to Oppressive Silence comics by Ethan Vincent. But that website in the corner is shady

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Huh? I thought having no valid moves that wouldn't lead to the king's death was a loss. How DO you lose then?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

That would be the case if the king was currently in check, but as he's currently on a safe space then it's stalemate

[–] PunnyName 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Have to put him in check, while also preventing him from moving into another spot that could also put him into check.

This would likely have been a stalemate anyway.

Edit: the bishop's existence didn't even register to me when I made this comment. More pieces are better, and yes, King and Queen are sufficient to mate. However, the fewer the pieces you have, the lower your chances of success.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

King and queen is fully sufficient to checkmate

[–] PunnyName 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I said likely. I know it's sufficient, but it's not inevitable.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is inevitable, there's no maybe about it

[–] PunnyName 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's possible to stalemate, too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not if the player with the queen has any idea at all what they're doing. By your logic, it's also possible to lose your queen by making a stupid move.

[–] PunnyName 1 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's been a long time since I played, but king+queen+bishop should be pretty achievable?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

It is, king and queen is all you need

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This would likely have been a stalemate anyway.

How come? I'm not very good at chess personally but I was under the impression that queen-bishop-king was generally sufficient to force a mate.

[–] PunnyName 1 points 2 days ago

Somehow I didn't even register the existence of the bishop. It's possible to mate with just king and queen, but more pieces the better.