this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
393 points (98.5% liked)

World News

40091 readers
3001 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump signed an executive order imposing 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports—excluding Canadian energy at 10%—plus additional duties on Chinese products.

In response, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a 25% duty on $155 billion in U.S. goods, beginning with $30 billion in tariffs Tuesday.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum indicated reciprocal tariffs, rejecting claims that Mexico tolerates criminal groups trafficking fentanyl and insisting on respect for sovereignty.

Experts warn these tit-for-tat measures could drive up costs, disrupt supply chains, and mirror the previous U.S.-China trade war, possibly harming security.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nogooduser 8 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

As tariffs hurt the importing country, not the exporting country I think that it’s odd that Canada would punish their own citizens in retaliation.

They should have added a 25% export tax on energy seeing as Trump clearly didn’t want to pay more for his imported energy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you heard the speech the fact that they are giving time for the full set of Tariffs mean we have a small set (booze) we are willing to cut right away. Ie. Jack Daniels is no longer on store shelves. Orange juice is no longer on store shelves.

The extra time is for Canadian companies to find alternative (non-American) suppliers. They may be more to import due to distance/time but less impact on tariffs and potentially still more cost at the end for consumers but at the same time not American goods.

The intention is to ween us off your teat.

I don't think Americans realize that long term this is not good for you. Once new trade routes come in, it's going to be hard for you to get those partnerships back on account of you showing yourselves as a horrible business partner.

Canada will hurt in the short term but we will be stronger in the long run.

The only thing I'm worried about now is a full on American invasion and I fear that's on the table.

[–] AA5B 2 points 2 hours ago

I don’t think Americans realize that long term this is not good for you

Of course we do, or half of us do. The other half just want to bully someone and chant “USA! USA!”

So far I’m hoping there’s a pattern of “doing something spiteful that will harm ourselves, but moving onto the next thing at the first hint of resistance”. The new administration is just doing a speed run of scapegoats and might be on to the next before you can say “WTF”. I’m hoping the booze will be enough: hurt jack daniels right in maga country, until we’re back to focussing on abusing immigrants and people who speak Spanish

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

As tariffs hurt the importing country, not the exporting country

They very obviously hurt both so long as there's any demand elasticity and especially when there are alternatives sources for the products .

[–] GrammarPolice 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Explain how demand elasticity affects both countries please. I expect Trump uses these tariffs as a scare tactic for countries who depend greatly on exports to America, but i don't know how elasticity of demand plays in.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Tariffs will drive the prices upward but consumers will still be compelled to make those purchases for a time, which is to say that they will just bite the cost because the alternative is less desirable. This demonstrates a lack of equilibrium between price and demand. In a non-elastic scenario, the rise in price would directly correlate to a decrease in demand.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So, is Canada going to import what it gets from the US (it's only geographic neighbour) from elsewhere?

If the answer is "no, not without at least a 26% jump in cost" then the tariff is a bad response.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Would you rather us bend over and take it?

Fuck America. You asked for this. Reap what you sowed. Unlike your trifling ass back home we are unified here. You have made us stronger as a nation.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

The US President imposes taxes on Canadian imports that US citizens will have to pay. In response, the Canadian Prime Minister retaliates with taxes on US imports that Canadians will have to pay.

Basically, both just want to raise taxes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Y'know, except for the part where Trudeau is saying it shouldn't be this way and free trade is beneficial to both economies... but yeah, it's both sides that are doing this for malicious self interest.