this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
255 points (92.6% liked)

Open Source

32331 readers
836 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyoncmdr 27 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There are plenty of step-by-step guides to run Deepseek locally. Hell, someone even had it running on a Raspberry Pi. It seems to be much more efficient than other current alternatives.

That's about as openly available to self host as you can get without a 1-button installer.

[–] tekato 12 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

You can run an imitation of the DeepSeek R1 model, but not the actual one unless you literally buy a dozen of whatever NVIDIA’s top GPU is at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago

A server grade CPU with a lot of RAM and memory bandwidth would work reasonable well, and cost "only" ~$10k rather than 100k+...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

I saw posts about people running it well enough for testing purposes on an NVMe.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Those are not deepseek R1. They are unrelated models like llama3 from Meta or Qwen from Alibaba "distilled" by deepseek.

This is a common method to smarten a smaller model from a larger one.

Ollama should have never labelled them deepseek:8B/32B. Way too many people misunderstood that.