this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
587 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39935 readers
3131 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Many methods of protest should make normal people angry. That's the entire point. Protests exist to be disruptive.

Block a billionaire's driveway, and they fly to a private luxury penthouse and don't have to deal with you ever again.

Block major roads, and everybody realizes that the only way they're going to get to work on time in a consistent manner going forward is by actually satisfying your movement's demands, voting against oil company supporting politicians, demanding they stop subsidizing fossil fuels, etc.

Making one billionaire's life marginally harder won't convince them to change anything. Making thousands or even millions of people's lives harder on a regular basis until they collectively force the billionaires to stop will most certainly change something.

This argument is like if you demanded that during the Civil Rights Movement protests, nobody ever did sit-ins at restaurants because it would annoy the patrons, but wasn't going directly after the politicians involved. In actuality, that was a key driver of furthering the movement, because not only did it make it difficult to maintain white-only infrastructure without annoyance, thus causing some business owners to rescind their policies since it was more trouble than it's worth, but it also gave people who were more on the fence a prescient reason to stop being segregationist.

In this analogy, the restaurants are the roads, the patrons are the people driving in their cars, and the business owner is the government managing the roads.

Once it becomes more difficult to maintain the current status quo, instead of having functional roads by caving to public pressure and ending subsidies, stopping new fossil fuel development, and migrating to cleaner alternatives, then those exact changes will get implemented.