this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
429 points (98.4% liked)

196

1803 readers
3313 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

She needs to at bare minimum describe in more detail what she wants if she wants something different

Exactly what I said. No need to add the layer of misogyny.

instead of doing the roleplay equivalent or starfishing and then complaining about it.

She said she plays along and tries to get him to let her go for sexual favors, did you ignore that part?

Seems like the guy has communicated (via acting out the roleplay)

"Hey honey, how did you like the new stuff you asked me to do?" Simple as that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Exactly what I said. No need to add the layer of misogyny.

No, you said:

Neither of their ideas are right or wrong, they just haven't communicated their desires yet.

To which I said:

Seems like the guy has communicated (via acting out the roleplay) exactly what his idea is, and the gal has totally failed to communicate that what she wants

The guy is communicating. He was asked to give a performance of a character, and he has done so with multiple characters.

The gal has not said she's actually given any specific feedback on this performance to the guy, so we would have to invent that into the story for her communication to be anything beyond 'hey roleplay as a cop and a spy'.

No clue how you're interpreting this as me being misogynistic, I'd have exactly the same position and words if the sex/genders were reversed or this was a man+man or woman+woman relationship or anything else.

She said she plays along and tries to get him to let her go for sexual favors, did you ignore that part?

No I didn't. Did you miss the part where she says her conception of a two person roleplay is one person does the major part of inventing a character and acting them out, and she just responds to that, instead of inventing her own character?

She could be playing an actual role, far outside of her normal character, say a burglar caught in the act, or a double agent under surveillance trying to make a deaddrop... but nope, she's just doing the bare minimum in terms of acting out a creative character, just reacting.

"Hey honey, how did you like the new stuff you asked me to do?" Simple as that.

Or she could use all these words she's written here on the internet and direct them toward the person who gave a performance she asked for and is unsatisfied with.

Why is the onus on only one person to both act and intuit criticism from said acting, when the gal never actually says she's told the guy he is doing anything wrong?

"Hey honey, can we tone this down to the level of a cheesy 90s porn parody and not be so intense?" Simple as that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Why is the onus on only one person to both act and intuit criticism from said acting, when the gal never actually says she's told the guy he is doing anything wrong?

Never said OOP didn't hold some of the blame for not communicating. It's a two way street though. You seem to be under the impression this is 100% her fault. I don't disagree she should be talking to her partner instead of asking online, but to think the guy hasn't done anything wrong by not asking how their new bedroom activity went is wrong as well. Both of their ideas of roleplay are correct, but it's not about who's right and wrong, it's about working together to make the experience enjoyable. I haven't seen evidence either party has done that.