this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
89 points (89.4% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

736 readers
155 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The article is very upfront about those details - that quote is right below the headline.

At no point does it claim or imply that renewables are ready to provide 100% of the state's energy. It clearly explains that this is a new record, never saying more than that.

Your tone is needlessly aggressive and you're accusing the article of misrepresenting something it never tried to represent in the first place.

If you're honestly not trolling, your post looks unfortunately similar to trolling.

[–] Cypher 14 points 1 week ago

I’m accusing the article of using weasel words to misrepresent the data, which after having a chance to read the study I can confirm beyond a doubt.

This paper uses data from the world's 5th-largest economy to show no blackouts occurred when wind-water-solar electricity supply exceeded 100 % of demand on California's main grid for a record 98 of 116 days from late winter to early summer, 2024, for an average (maximum) of 4.84 (10.1) hours/day.

So an average of 4.84 hours/day of 100% power requirements were met by renewables. That is not the story the author is telling.

Going with the maximum and representing that as occurring for 98/116 days as the author did is straight up misleading for anyone not paying attention to those weasel words.

It would have taken the author zero effort to include the average. It’s right there in the source paper.