this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
75 points (98.7% liked)
Texas
1549 readers
24 users here now
A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas
Other Texas/US Lemmy Communties to follow
Sports
- Houston Astros
- Houston Texans
- Houston Rockets
- Texas Rangers
- Dallas Cowboys
- Dallas Stars
- Austin FC
- San Antonio Spurs
Rules (Subject to Change)
-
Be a Decent Human Being
-
Posting news articles: Please use exact article Titles
-
Posts must have something to do with Texas
-
Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
-
No NSFW content
-
Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Everything is bigger in Texas, even the concentration camps.
Have no doubt they'll use the thirteenth amendment to use them as slaves.
They won't. It will defeat their case if they do:
They are arguing that immigrants are not "subject to the laws of the United States", which basically means they can be treated as enemy combatants or POWs.
But they can't be prosecuted for crimes, let alone convicted.
It doesn't seem that Dawn Buckingham got the memo, but these facilities can't be for "violent criminal deportation", as "violent criminals" are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
These facilities have to be for "repatriating captured enemy combatants to their nation of origin".
Conviction is the easy part.
No they'll argue they're subject to the laws but not the protection under law as there's already precedent for that. I think people forgot how industrialized we've made racism, this is just making back on ole reliable.
14th amendment:
If they make the argument you just made, they kill their argument against birthright citizenship.
Jurisdiction can mean power over it doesn't actually imply protection from, we have other amendments for that. They'll argue some limited wording in the constitution and the 4th, 13th, and 14th amendments allows for illegals to not fall under the umbrella of constitutional protections.
It's a bad argument sure, but they don't generally have good arguments they just have 98% of government under their control and a rabid fan base. While it shouldn't be a winning argument it probably will be in this regime.