this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
648 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

61287 readers
4307 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And they're already kissing Trump's ass

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (14 children)

I wish people knew that TikTok being banned was more about it not suppressing posts about Palestine than national security or whatever else they say. Antony Blinken and Mitt Romney outright said last year it was about stopping people from seeing the truth about Israel committing genocide. If the government actually cared about foreign influence operations they'd regulate data privacy and social media algorithms in some way (idk how, but I'm sure you could) but they obviously won't because US companies manipulating people and stealing their data is totally fine.

[–] finitebanjo -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

If that were true then they wouldn't have given ByteDance the option to sell 80% to citizens and continue operating.

The law also bans every company from doing the same thing, sending personal data to any of the listed adversarial nations or being more than 20% owned by them. Why ban every company if they only cared about the Palestine message?

[–] dx1 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that were true then they wouldn’t have given ByteDance the option to sell 80% to citizens and continue operating.

Except the entire point of that is the U.S. ownership would succumb to that pressure.

[–] finitebanjo 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

*U.S. Citizen Ownership

Because yeah, Chinese Military ownership is problematic for an app used by US Citizens.

[–] dx1 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh, now it's owned by the Chinese military?

Which part of "freedom of speech" involves precluding us from ingesting content from a country our government decided it doesn't like? Or electing to send our own device data or interactions to that country?

[–] finitebanjo 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was always owned by Chinese Military.

[–] dx1 1 points 1 week ago

Sure, if you say so.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)