this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
-4 points (44.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7403 readers
819 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This week’s “breakthrough” in ceasefire negotiations to end the genocidal campaign against Gaza came, according to regional sources, after a single intervention by US president-elect Trump’s designated envoy Steve Witkoff in which he ordered Netanyahu's government to capitulate.

While we might be skeptical of Trump’s habit of claiming credit for any progress, it was corroborated by the far-right members of the Netanyahu government erupting into the kind of tantrum for which they are now world-famous, framing the deal as a disaster imposed on "Israel" by the incoming administration.

In the aftermath of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, Biden, while parroting "Israel’s" atrocity propaganda about beheaded infants in ovens, gave Netanyahu a carte blanche to declare total war on the people of Gaza. As the unique scale of the atrocities in the Strip became clear, Biden proceeded, through his spineless UN ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield, to provide diplomatic cover for the genocide at the Security Council.

In June, Biden lied that a ceasefire deal had finally been reached, that it was at the initiative of the Netanyahu government, and that the Israeli leadership had accepted it. Secretary of State Antony Blinken clownishly trumpeted this falsehood, along with the claim that the only impediment to the ceasefire was Hamas’ refusal of its terms. It was well known at the time to be a lie, but the breakthrough of the last week confirms it beyond all doubt.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (19 children)

It it in the post.

This week’s “breakthrough” in ceasefire negotiations to end the genocidal campaign against Gaza came, according to regional sources, after a single intervention by US president-elect Trump’s designated envoy Steve Witkoff in which he ordered Netanyahu’s government to capitulate.

The president holds 100% of the leverage. If Biden was serious for a single second about trying to stop the genocide it would have ended instantly.

[–] BrokenGlepnir -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (18 children)

The us president can't order Israel without some kind of threat. That's not a threat. I bet Biden never said "stop I want to win this election" to Israel. Trump did call Israel during the election and said likely said "keep going I want to win this election"

Edit: I said threat, but there could also be an offer. What did he offer or threaten that Biden didn't? Or was it just the same, but Israel would not see the way or on the horizon?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

Lol yeah, poor powerless POTUS just had no leverage to threaten Israel. Christ BlueAnon liberals are coping hard, this ceasefire has really broken your brains

[–] BrokenGlepnir -2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say he was powerless. I said what leverage did Donald Trump use that joe Biden didn't and you cannot answer me. What beyond asking please did he do!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know what specific piece of leverage he invoked, given that Israel is almost entirely reliant on the US to exist, it could be a lot of things: maybe he threatened to stop sending tens of billions in arms, maybe he threatened to withdraw USA military assets from Israel and Yemen. Maybe he threatened to stop protecting Israel from international law. Maybe he threatened to side with the International Court. Maybe he threatened sanctions, maybe he threatened an embargo. Maybe he threatened to deploy the US military to drive Israel out of Gaza.

The US has near infinite leverage over Israel, the fact that Biden refused to use it, because he supports Israel and it's genocide, doesn't change that.

[–] BrokenGlepnir -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Or maybe he didn't use any additional leverage and just pulled a Ronald Reagan. Or maybe he did use a form of leverage you aren't mentioning, offered to give them something when they stop, which a. Wouldn't necessarily be bad but also b. Wouldn't necessarily be mutually exclusive with pulling what Reagan did with Carter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

No.

Carter did not spend the year before the election aggressively supporting Iran, sending Iran billions in weapons, deploying the USA military to defend Iran, and shielding Iran from the international community and international law. Reagan could not force him to do that, just like Trump could not force Biden to do that. Biden chose to do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)