this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
76 points (97.5% liked)

World News

40007 readers
2704 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s a scenario that would make Tesla’s Ceo, Elon Musk, shudder: a future where self-driving cars are the norm but a catastrophic electronic breakdown traps thousands of people inside them.

This dystopian vision of the future was one sketched out by science fiction writers at an event this week where experts were asked to prepare Britain for threats ranging from pandemics to cyber and nuclear attacks.

The writers joined researchers and policymakers working in crisis management and resilience at the gathering organised by RBOC (Resilience Beyond Observed Capabilities), a network of academics whose funders include the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zarathustra0 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So the best way to stop a runaway train is usually to derail it. I'm not saying we won't get to the point where derailing the train becomes a socially acceptable idea, but I don't think we're there just yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you think about it ..... no matter what we do or don't do, the train will get derailed anyway.

But it also implies that we have no control at all. We are able to apply brakes, to stop or slow the engine or do things to slow the carriage ..... we just don't want to because we think the ride is fun and instead blissfully ignore the end of the track and happily increase speed.

[–] zarathustra0 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Perhaps in theory we do, but that involves a whole load of people changing their behaviour at the same time, and that's pretty difficult to achieve.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I agree and I also agree that we probably won't change on our own any time soon. The point I was trying to make was that if we objectively step back and look at it all .... we are going to change in the near future whether we want to or not. Right now we have a choice to want to change .... there is coming a time when we won't have any choice but to change. This also doesn't imply that the future changes will be good or bad, beneficial or detrimental, enlightened or dystopian. Right now if we stopped or slowed down, we can figure out where we're headed or where we'll end up but if we continue, once we fly off those tracks and into the abyss, who knows where we'll land.