this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
64 points (68.0% liked)
Technology
60606 readers
4763 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's no IRL data for the specific model I've described, but I'm not sure what you mean by "feelings based". Using otherwise excess energy instead of storing it is a considered, rational strategy.
This is feelings based. Thanks for clarifying.
The document linked doesn't go into detail for good reason. It's a bunch of half cooked ideas distilled to make a good read... but misses a lot of key points. Most notably: it hand waves through storage.
The electrical grid is a lot like a pressure system in a sense: we have a lot of equipment that is designed to work at a very specific pressure. Outside of those ranges things break. The article mentions feeding back into the grid which is fine and well... but fails to mention how that needs to be managed so as to not blow the whole thing up. Also that solar system you have isn't going to be feeding shit back into the grid without a buffer... which is storage... for the same reason that you likely will struggle to have a solar home without batteries. The sun is variable and your "stuff" needs a very specific range of power. Too much? zap. Too little? brownout. Either way: rip electronics.
The very things you are suggesting as solutions to power storage literally require it to work.