Technology

59590 readers

6400 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

181

1Password vs BitWarden (self.technology)

submitted 1 year ago by schmurnan to c/technology

145 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just wondered what people are using for their password management.

I’m currently using 1Password on a family subscription for both password management and 2FA (and then Authy for the 1Password 2FA). But I’m seeing a lot more posters — particularly since joining Lemmy — championing BitWarden (either cloud or self hosted) and Raivo OTP as a cheaper, almost-as-functional alternative.

So is it worth the switch? Will I lose out on anything by doing so?

I’m currently running BitWarden with a free account to see if I can live with it. But I must admit, 1Password is a staple app for me and one that I would say is priceless to my workflow and setup.

Just interested in your thoughts and trying to stimulate conversation!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the problem with Electron apps?

[–] schmurnan 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s personal preference of course. This article may explain it better than I ever could (might not be the best source, was just a quick DDG search).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never understood those problems. I'm not saying they don't exist, I haven't investigated it or anything lol, but I don't see why individual non-electron programs have less overhead than individual electron programs when the argument is that multiple would-be electron apps could share one browser instance because multiple non-electron apps also don't share anything.

Also I don't see how not using a chromium base would make programs better about having massive 1 GB directories of various temp files.

What am I missing? Because clearly those problems exist.

[–] schmurnan 1 points 1 year ago

I can’t say I fully understand the ins and outs of it because, like you, I’ve never looked into it in any great detail.

I’ve used VS Code for a while and I remember seeing a post on Reddit about how good it is “for an Electron app”, which raised my interest. I then saw more and more complaints about Electron apps, mainly around how they consume a lot of resource and ultimately crash peoples machines, resulting in data loss.

Don’t get me wrong, I see the benefits of Electron apps — they’re easy to deploy across multiple OSes which makes things a lot easier for developers. But I guess as a macOS user, I do love a native app for its look and feel and user experience. Not knocking that on all Electron apps, it’s just a preference.