this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
721 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

61196 readers
4361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah I don't think the government should run a search engine

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Who do you trust more, Google or the EU?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The EU. I don't use google search. I use a degoogled android rom firefox and only use the bare minimum of google search engines. I think the government should promote conditions where fair competition against google is actually possible.

[–] iopq 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's fine, but then who does the search engine?

You can do things decentralized, and if you look into it, the EU is happy to fund projects to create decentralized internet services. Case in point, Lemmy's primary funder is the EU.

[–] iopq 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use brave, but only the search

Funding an existing project like Lemmy is different than hiring people to create a lemmy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are not just funding existing projects like Lemmy, they are actively encouraging new projects by providing funding for "open internet" style stuff.

Though yes you are right, it is different from directly hiring people, since if they did that, it would be very hard to relinquish direct control of the project. Corps can't act solely for the common good, governments have that as their stated mission.

[–] iopq 1 points 1 week ago

I'm fine with some funding for other people who are running things for public benefit. The difference is a meaningful one, since governments have rules about how they do contracting work. It ends up with companies that focus on government contracts that know all the rules and have the connections.

A couple of people running an open source project don't have the same restrictions