this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
64 points (68.0% liked)

Technology

60607 readers
4763 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
enu
technopagan
64
Vistra's battery storage facility goes up in flames, spurs evacuation orders (www.yahoo.com)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/technology
105 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would be very useful if you were asking the right question. The storage facility from the article has a 750 MW storage capacity (energy) which it can deliver at a max output (power) of 3000 MW/hr Power plant and storage facility capacities are measured in MW since what they are intended to do is supply power at a steady rate. Who cares if you can store a billion TW of power if you can only output it at 5mW/h. It does no good if you can't get it out. Supply is what we really care about here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

True to your name, you’re using those backwards. You’re thinking of MW hours per hour, or just MW. Put differently, MW is a rate, MWh is a quantity.