Politics
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only
▪️ Title must match the article headline
▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)
▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.
Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
view the rest of the comments
General hospitals and we had huge fucking budgets. We had to tone it down to make it look less "rich."
Hospitals are famously expensive to build, I would expect them to have a pretty huge budget compared to a normal facility the same size.
Plus, that's counter intuitive to your argument. If it was run by finance bros wouldn't you expect them to spend as little as possible on facilities?
Hospital networks aren't the cash grab they used to be, a lot has changed in the last 10-15 years, really since the affordable care act passed. Which if you read the article is when this hospital group first started having financial problems.
The way insurance companies responded to the bill was to do more business with private clinics and hospitals where they could set up in network reimbursement programs.