this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
1011 points (95.7% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

594 readers
229 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but the courts used some bullshit reasoning to uphold it anyway. They said it didn't constitute a punishment because the law required a sale rather than a confiscation, and because the company could theoretically re-enter the market with a different app (lol).

I suppose it's similar to eminent domain where the government can force you to sell your house if it's in the way of something like a rail line, but it's not considered a punishment since you're compensated for it (at whatever price they decide is fair). Basically, the government is allowed to fuck with you quite a bit so long as they can provide a justification for why they're doing it that isn't personal.

[–] pyre 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

thank you; that was very informative. I tried to look it up but every article seemed to approach it from the first amendment angle and I didn't find anything about equal protection.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The phrase you're looking for for a law that targets a specific entity is "Bill of Attainder."

This was my source for the info, that includes the text of the court ruling.

[–] pyre 2 points 5 days ago

awesome, thanks!