this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
84 points (98.8% liked)
World News
32622 readers
550 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The timing seems very convenient, no? Especially since this was the Achilles heel of the dems.
Very convenient that Donald Trump did the thing Joe Biden could have done for 15 months. Ending the genocide with a single phone call.
Democrats have been gaslit into infinity. They now actually believe that the president of the USA does not have the power to stop Israel because Biden chose not to do so.
Netanyahu knows Trump is going to be better for HIS Israeli right wing party. The cease-fire was going to happen either way, because his Israeli party is paying too much of an international and domestic cost at this point. Netanyahu waited to be sure to give Trump the win if possible because he knows Trump will capitulate to his party. It was going to go this way after the election either way. It was self-serving. Wait and see what happens after the “cease fire.” This was politics between like minded parties, not compassion for the people of Gaza.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-likely-prefers-trump-in-historically-close-race-but-hes-hedging-his-bets/
Why didn’t he wait a week after Trump swearing in
Makes sense. I just wish it wasn't so obvious how corrupt all this is.
It's sad that we long for the good old days of people having the decency to make an effort to hide their corruption.
The faction that was blocking the bill has the green light to get stuck into the West Bank now trumps in and Gaza is quickly becoming an ever smaller death camp which is bad optics with little upside.
They had just as much of green light under Biden: nobody was stopping them from doing whatever they like in West Bank.
I guess they should’ve hired you and could’ve saved 100m
Facts are facts
They’re not facts just a naive one dimensional take.
Ok. They're also facts though.
And so are the things I said. Turns out you need to consider lots of facts to realise the whole fact.
No, what you said was speculation.
Nope
https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/netanyahu-offers-deals-to-smotrich--ben-gvir-to-secure-cease
Your own article literally agrees with me, not you.
on what?