Technology

60544 readers

6721 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s

enu

technopagan

365

[Gamers Nexus] Investigation: GamersNexus Files New Lawsuit Against PayPal & Honey (youtu.be)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/technology

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It could never apply to ad blockers. You install an ad blocker knowing that it will block stuff... and explicitly WANTING it to do so.

Nobody installed honey knowing that it was manipulating cookies and stuff. The normal layperson who installs it will just think "It's just chucking in coupon codes into that box!"...

One is predicated on a lie of omission... the other is literally what the user wants. There's a huge difference...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You’re looking at it from an end user perspective. “I want it to do this, so it’s ok” for an ad blocker, but “I didn’t know it was doing this so it’s bad” for Honey.

But the LE/GN cases are that Honey changed URLs and cost them the sale revenue, no? That’s not the end user experience. Seems like that could easily be pivoted to a website who claims lost revenue was stolen from them because ad blockers are manipulating their site/URLs, end users’ desires be damned.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

But the LE/GN cases are that Honey changed URLs and cost them the sale revenue, no?

https://www.cpmlegal.com/assets/htmldocuments/GamersNexus%20v.%20Paypal.pdf

a. Nationwide Class: All persons and entities in the United States who participated in an affiliate commission program with a United States eCommerce merchant and had commissions diverted to PayPal as a result of Honey.

So yes, they're suing on behalf of creators.

But they're using logic of what is promised/advertised to users... alongside the creator side of it all.

Consumers download the PayPal Honey browser extension under the promise that Honey will search the web for the best coupons to ensure consumers pay the lowest prices when checking out with eCommerce merchants [...] After this affiliate network partnership is established, on information and belief, Honey deliberately withholds higher-value coupons, directly contradicting Honey’s promise to consumers.

Which we know is inaccurate at this point and honey is lying. Most of the rest will come out in discovery if Honey wants to fight it. And I think it's safe to say that anything that comes out in discovery will simply hang honey even more than we already know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Gotcha. Thanks for providing the additional detail! It is comforting to learn why it’s unlikely this could affect ad block.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

It could never apply to ad blockers.

I mean it certainly could if it was deemed so broad as "Honey was manipulating affiliate links", but I don't think it would.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 0 points 1 day ago

Because the courts in America have proven how much they care about rule of law and procedure when it comes to rich offenders lately..