this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
1858 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

5493 readers
1756 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lepinkainen 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is something AI would be good for

Have it search for specific misinformation and reply with a canned response with sources using an official account.

[–] frog_brawler 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Or someone can just train an AI to spit out more misinformation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName 2 points 2 days ago

We're years in at this point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Dead Internet Theory and so.

[–] lepinkainen 2 points 2 days ago

Then it’s going to be AI vs AI

In this case the misinformation AI will be run by Musk’s sugar daddy Putin so it won’t get banned

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Or someone could train a bot to exaggerate misinformation from known liars

Community note: In fact, Oregon sent over 420 fire trucks but due to the rampage of the woke chupacabra and the cannibals of the northern California mountains, only 69 made it as far south as Sacramento. At that point California officials realized that Oregon actually sent minivans full of weed and spent the weekend hotboxing, using the Jewish space laser that started the fires on the "defrost" setting to heat up the marijuana.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

dont need AI for this. its why we have systems like webs of trust and peer verification. standard crypto + some social communication solves a lot of these problems.

[–] lepinkainen 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How can a web of trust prevent Joe-bob from claiming bullshit like in the OP?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

first question you'd need to answer is how joe-bob got into the web of trust in the first place. in order for them to abuse their position they needed to be added to your web.

literally what bluesky is doing with their filters.

if you want to automate it.... run statistical analysis on the user for how many people ban them. you eventually find the people who are heavy but accurate with the ban button and can use them as inputs. and can use them as early gauges for new accounts. combine that with account age and you'll eventually get a fairly robust and automated platform for banning misinformation accounts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have you seen some of the "factual" information AI states definitively?

[–] lepinkainen 1 points 2 days ago

Generic LLMs are shit, they try to do everything