Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- [email protected] - International and local legal news.
- [email protected] - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- [email protected] - Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
- [email protected] - News and information about Europe.
Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].
view the rest of the comments
In California, anyway. There was a bill/measure whatever the hell to make contractors with services like Uber, DoorDash, etc get treated like normal hired employees, so they would have a minimum wage, guaranteed breaks and lunch, and all the other protections offered to employees here.
How did they do a vote amongst just them? Was it like through the job? Did you have to show your app at the polling place?
It was a measure on the ballot in 2016, I think? Maybe 2020? The same as the more recent one that passed giving restaurant employees a bump up to $21/hour in pay without changing the $16/hour state minimum wage.
If you're taking the piss about blaming the gig workers themselves: The idiots working these jobs were blasting their intentions on SM, thinking the way it works now is better for them. They weren't shy about bending over for their corporate masters.
Paid shills. Look into the california case further, and you'll see the companies were lobbying their asses off to twist reality. Including several cases where they paid actors or their contractors to puppet their speaking points in ads and on social media.
They didn't convince the workers. Bt they only had to spend the money to convince the general public.
It worked.
Even on you. You actually think the workers themselves voted against their own interests, and hence you don't feel for them.
I don't think fondly of the people who voted for Trump, either. If you drink the Kool-Aid because the guy handing it out said it was fine, after being warned about the potential outcome of said Kool-Aid repeatedly by everyone else, at some point you share in the blame for the outcome.
Ok.
Then what is your solution short of executing these people?
If you want the next vote to go according to reality, your solution MUST include getting people to change their minds.
You don't do that by going "lol you guys shat your beed, now sleep in it".
You claim they were repeatedly told and warned, but the fact that things went the way they did, proves they weren't.
You're only blaming them, because it's easier than acknowledging that more should have been done.
Your apathy and dispassion on the matter is literally part of the problem, and one of the things the lobbying done by these companies sets out to achieve.
You and many of these other replies are acting like lobbying only happens one way and is the sole reason for shit like this. Lobbying works both ways. There was considerable campaigns ran against the corporate interests, too, in favor of pushing the new law forward.
First of all, I said I find it hard to sympathize with people who vote against their best interest. If you took that as a suggestion of executing people you are out of your damn head and I would thank you not to put words in my fucking mouth.
Second, the problem is the complete lack of critical thinking that leads to people being persuaded by the highest conflict of interest invested in keeping the status quo while you're being fucked over. To start, we should be better funding the education system in this country instead of funding Israel to bomb the fuck out of Palestinians and shit.
Clearly, not enough effective ones.
The point is, you have to sympathize. That's literally step one of changing anyone's mind. If you cant pull that one off, you've already failed.
The only alternative is the other extreme. If you can't get people to vote differently, the only option you have left is to remove them entirely.
So are you blaming the people too uninformed to vote for their own interests, or not? Cuz this sounds like exactly the kind of thinking I'm trying to tell you to engage in instead of the "it's their own fault, fuckem"-attitude you walked in with.
I see.
The story in the article is from the UK.
Woosh