this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
2 points (57.1% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3111 readers
386 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
whoopThereItIs
pushpush
[email protected]
cosmic_slate
2
Technology Connections’ thoughts on GM and Ford’s move to abandon the CCS connector in favor of “NACS” (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago by BombOmOm to c/evs
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One standardized conector should be a good thing?

[–] BombOmOm 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Absolutely. And since the underlying communications protocol for both connectors is CCS, adapters already exist if your car happens to have a different charge port.

Though, there will probably be some fenangling for the next year or two to get the final wrinkles out before we can truly have any car able to charge at any charger.