this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
816 points (98.2% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

599 readers
305 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (47 children)

I've been looking for a new apartment the last three months. After Jan 1st all of them owned by a rentail company raised thier asking price.

Annual price increase is 35%. Who tf gets a 35% raise every year?

It's the corpo landlords causing the problem. My private landlord never did any of that.

[–] nalinna 44 points 1 week ago (38 children)

Private landlords are about to get harder and harder to come by...it's about to be corpos all the way down. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/21/how-wall-street-bought-single-family-homes-and-put-them-up-for-rent.html

[–] aesthelete 18 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I think a bigger threat than corporations buying single family houses is that there are certain types of housing that will likely never not be owned by a single entity such as the large apartment buildings with shared entry areas.

I think the YIMBYs need to start adding "ownable units of housing" to their list of things to look for when developing new housing structures. A lot of places in California are starting to build again, but they're building a lot of corporate-owned apartment buildings with hundreds of units that only help further consolidate the housing market.

My neighborhood did a mixed development model and I think that's the way it should go: some apartments, some townhouses, some condos. Stop letting a single company own the entirety of the new housing units you're building.

[–] Zannsolo 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Corps should only be able to own apartment style housing. I'd be fine with more of them being built if we removed single family homes from the rental market.

[–] aesthelete 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That varies a lot depending upon where you're talking about. In my area, the overwhelming majority of people that rent aren't renting single family houses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My area of New England, rentals seem to be either big corporate places or a unit in a triple-decker (3-story building with a single unit on each floor, traditionally owned by someone who lives in one of the units).

I live in a condo I own, which seems like an ok balance of privacy, responsibility, and being able to actually afford housing. Mortgage, HOA fee, taxes, etc, is still $800/month cheaper than my old corporate apartment, and I promise you I'm not spending $800/month in maintenance and neither was my landlord.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)