this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
211 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39614 readers
3140 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Greenlandic MP Pipaluk Lynge condemned Donald Trump Jr.'s visit as a staged effort to portray locals as supportive of U.S. annexation.

His team reportedly distributed MAGA hats to residents, barred journalists, and organized managed photo ops, including locals speaking with Donald Trump on speakerphone.

“We know how they treat the Inuit in Alaska,” Lynge hit back. “Make that great before trying to invade us.”

Lynge and Danish PM Mette Frederiksen reiterated Greenland’s rejection of U.S. takeover threats, while Greenlandic PM Múte Bourup Egede emphasized the island’s focus on sovereignty and independence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

he did actually, Instagram comments said it was a 757

[–] FlashMobOfOne 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, then I hope he keeps flying in one. Cheers.

[–] ms_lane 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In a 757?

That's one of the most reliable aircraft Boeing ever made, out of 1049 made from 1981 to 2004, only 10 have been lost - 2 of which were lost on Sep. 11 2001...

Hopefully he decides the 757 is a little old and 737MAX issues were just 'fake news'

[–] TheRealKuni 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The 737MAX is a perfectly safe plane. MCAS has been neutered, can only activate if there is not a significant discrepancy between AOA sensors, can now only engage once per flight, and is also limited in the trim adjustment it’s capable of making on that one activation.

The door plug issue was horrific, but that has also been rectified through additional checks during installation, just like any other similar issue that has cropped up over decades of flight.

Is it absurd that Boeing included systems that were unsafe on a modern airliner, and could crash a plane due to a single failure point? Absolutely. Fuck Boeing. I’ll take Airbus any day.

But there’s no reason to be afraid of flying in a 737MAX. It’s essentially just the 737NG with bigger engines, a nicer cockpit, and a few other upgrades, much like the A320neo vs the A320ceo.

[–] DacoTaco 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Does the mcas still rely on one sensor on the front of the plane or have they learned and added one for good measure? Ye 737 max is safer now, yes. But fuck boeing for trying to cheap out and costing thousands of lives

[–] TheRealKuni 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The MCAS wasn’t an issue of cheaping out, it was an evolution of a less-dangerous system that fell through the cracks and highlighted shortcomings with the FAA’s self-approval system. It’s a long story, but the short version is because the type of system it was wasn’t considered critical it was approved for being fed by only one source of data. And in its earlier iterations for military use it was far less powerful in terms of how much stabilizer trim it could apply. As it evolved it became much more potent, and also reset every time the pilots used their trim switches, leading to disaster. Mentour Pilot has done some really good videos about it, especially his analyses of the Lion Air crash and the Ethiopian Airlines crash.

Now it receives data from multiple sources and won’t activate if they disagree profoundly. It also can only ever activate once per flight now, which means even in the event of erroneous activation the pilots can easily trim it out.

[–] DacoTaco 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It kinda was cheaping out. They wanted to release the plane asap, but without mcas they needed to recertify the whole plane which wouldve taken time and wouldve lost them a shit ton of sales to airbus. So they faked it with mcas.
Whatever you call it, the mcas system was a whole bunch of shit piled layers layers of shit. The videos are very interesting, ye.
Thank god the data comes from multiple sensors and and it can be ignored!