this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
387 points (98.0% liked)

RetroGaming

20219 readers
428 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was printed in Playboy magazine in April 2001.

It's hard to explain to people who weren't around back then how loose the "rules" were for making games. Conker's Bad Fur Day was definitely trying to market itself as edgy, but aside from some faith-based groups who would be upset, nobody really cared.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

Even back then this kind of advertisement (and game) was an anomaly coming from Nintendo.

[–] woelkchen 21 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Even back then this kind of advertisement (and game) was an anomaly coming from Nintendo.

Yeah. One reason being that this wasn't a Nintendo game. It was a Rare/THQ game. Nintendo didn't publish this.

[–] cfi 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Rare was basically a second party developer back in those days. They were given access to internal tools from Nintendo, a direct hotline for help, hell they even developed Nintendo IPs, which was unheard of for a western developer and is still rare even today

[–] Lemminary 5 points 3 weeks ago

is still rare even today

Yes, very Rare of them.

[–] woelkchen 1 points 3 weeks ago

Doesn't change the fact that Nintendo only owned a minority share and that this specific game was not published by Nintendo. They had access to the development tools already, so it was no special treatment for Conker.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)