Pleasant Politics

255 readers

55 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read [email protected] for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

556

Pro-Luigi Mangione content is filling up social platforms — and it's a challenge to moderate it (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Luigi Mangione has drawn lots of defenders on social media. That's a challenge for platforms when it comes to moderation — and for users.

Archived link of the article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dasus 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Are you genuinely so brainwashed you've bought into MAGA propaganda, thinking Trump is just "saying some offensive things"?

No man.

He's a literal rapist. In several cases.

This case, Carroll II, was tried in April and May 2023. Ms. Carroll contended that Mr. Trump had assaulted her in a dressing room at a New York department store where, among other things, he forcibly penetrated her vagina with his fingers and his penis. She testified in person for most of three days and was cross-examined intensively. Her sexual assault claim was corroborated by two “outcry” witnesses in whom Ms. Carroll had confided shortly after the attack, and was supported by six other fact witnesses. Mr. Trump's defense – based exclusively on an attempt to discredit Ms. Carroll and her other witnesses – in substance was that no assault ever had occurred, that he did not even know Ms. Carroll, and that her accusations were a “Hoax.” Mr. Trump, however, did not testify in person or even attend the trial despite ample opportunity to do so.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html#caselaw-content

I'd know about you, but the dressing room of a department store isn't exactly private even if it's not "broad daylight" public.

So what non-self-serving political agenda does Trump's raping(s) serve in your opinion?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Are you genuinely so brainwashed you’ve bought into MAGA propaganda, thinking Trump is just “saying some offensive things”?

That's quite the conclusion you've jumped too considering I said nothing positive about Trump, do not see him as a legitimate president, and have more respect for Hitler than Trump as Hitler at least had the decency to put a bullet in his own head.