Hardware

896 readers

533 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 weeks ago by GreenEngineering3475 to c/hardware

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Can it topple x86 and Arm, or is the gap too wide to close?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn’t China still pushing it hard for reasons of sovereignty? Given China’s surplus manufacturing capacity, that should give it a lift.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yup. There's loongarch which is much faster (only 1-2 generations behind the latest x86) but it's proprietary as far as I know.

[–] Alphane_Moon 1 points 2 weeks ago

From what I remember, loongarch is more than 2 generations behind, PR benchmarks notwithstanding.