this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
647 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

6091 readers
3510 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 72 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That makes no sense. How can an entity own the hospital, sell the land and then charge the hospital it owns rent?

Here’s what really happened. https://www.axios.com/2024/03/06/hospital-debacle-private-equity-cerberus-steward

Still shit? Abso-fucking-lutely! But it’s actually real and makes sense.

[–] Serinus 64 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But that says the same thing, just in more detail.

In 2016 it signed a $1.25 billion sale-leaseback agreement for its Mass. properties with a publicly traded firm called Medical Properties Trust.

For example, it's stopped paying vendors and owes at least $50 million in back-rent to MPT.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No it’s different. The sold them, agreed to lease them back, failed to pay the lease and then left someone else holding the bag.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago

I think you're getting hung up on a small detail. Yeah, the original post does imply it's Cerberus charging rent, but nuances like this are hard to convey in the format and I don't think it matters to the overall point. Cerberus still sold the real estate, made huge amount of money and left the physicians to foot the bill (never mind making the physicians take out a huge load to buy back control).