this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
539 points (90.9% liked)

Greentext

5065 readers
2233 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Armchair psychology by your local dipshit:

Depression tends to be irrational, and thus thought processes around it tend to be irrational.

[–] shneancy 63 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"if i can't have it, nobody should have it"

also applies to everyone who opposes progress because they had it hard in life

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a lot of people. They're a fucking problem.

[–] Zombiepirate 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well I've had to deal with them my whole life, so you should too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I was in power we'd deal with them alright. Forced relocation to Bitterville, with a dictatorial mayor hell bent on fixing nothing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I kinda get that. Its like trying to be happy for a billionaire who lives in a castle whilst you can barely afford rent.

[–] moriquende 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except people having it easier due to progress comes at the cost of nobody, while billionaires having it good comes at great cost to everybody but them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd argue that progress always comes at a cost to something, loss of jobs, rarer to mine minerals, loss in quality to meet demand, etc. But I hear ya

[–] currycourier 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yea for sure, but the cost-benefit is usually (hopefully) pretty skewed. Like even redistributing wealth from billionaires comes at a 'cost' to the billionaires, but the downside is their bank account number is smaller (which, who cares). I know you're not disagreeing btw, just adding to the discussion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

No no appreciate the perspective, not all bad is net bad

[–] shneancy 3 points 1 month ago

this doesn't really apply to billionaires, the same people who oppose things like student debt forgiveness will also lick billionaires' boots and present them as the role models of the "american dream"

it's the bitter people who had it hard in life, and think new generations having it easier is something bad, it's unfair, even though as a civilisation we should all strive to make life easier for those who come after us. but no "if i had it bad in life, you have to go through the same, or you're not really [insert whatever group you feel like, man/woman/american/minority]", as if struggle and suffering was a right of passage