this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
625 points (89.5% liked)

Lefty Memes

4618 readers
1923 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

The most middle of the road opinion on Israel-Palestine issue is the two state solution. It worked on Northern Ireland with the Good Friday Agreement and it should work between Israel and Palestine. Many scholars from both sides also want to use NI peace deal as the blueprint. Compromise is the key just like with Protestants and Catholics did in Northern Ireland.

The problem is, of course radicals from both Palestine and Israel do not want this because-- well-- they're radical.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

This is false. Only Israel does not want a two state solution. Even Hamas accepted it in 2017.

This is what people mean with enlightened centrism. There are no two sides preventing peace. There is only Israel preventing peace.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The 2017 Hamas charter is openly available on the Internet, and it says it still doesn't recognise Israel as a state and strive for "complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea." This is not really a two-state solution. Two states recognise each other's right to exist if this is indeed a two state solution.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course Hamas is not stupid like the PA. They will not recognize Israel unless Israel agrees to a two state solution.

Your arguments are the most generic Hasbara so I am not assuming you are speaking in good faith.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hamas stated "from the river to the sea" in that charter you yourself mentioned. That could not be any more ambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes of course they have the right to regain all their stolen land unless Israel wants to accept a deal. What is your point exactly?

Read this before typing your next comment

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/5/2/hamas-accepts-palestinian-state-with-1967-borders

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 0 points 2 weeks ago

without recognising the statehood of Israel

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

They've pretty explicitly been aiming for a Palestinian state in the territories occupied since 1967. And not just recently, proposals for a permanent ceasefire (which sets the first steps towards recognition and normalization of relations) with Israel under these conditions go back to 1999. Conveniently, both Israel and the US didn't find it necessary to respond.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] TheFonz -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think we can track down several times two state option was on the table, starting as early as 68

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Very cool and false. But now everyone accepts it except Israel.

[–] TheFonz -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What is the benefit from lying? I don't get it. This is all basic info.

The two-state solution is supported by many countries, and the Palestinian Authority. Israel currently does not support the idea, though it has in the past. The first proposal for separate Jewish and Arab states in the territory was made by the British Peel Commission report in 1937.

It was also on the table at Camp David.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How does that prove they're lying about Israel currently not supporting it?

Right now they're wanting to just take the land after eliminating the people who lived there

[–] TheFonz 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because I said it was on the table several times in the past. And they wrote:

Very cool and false

???

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes because they've (Israel) always negotiated in good faith. Even the camp David accords was a 2 state solution in name only

[–] TheFonz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, there you have it. The most unproductive statements as usual. If you don't know the specifics, why comment? Why not discuss the actual policies or the historical details? Why live in the realm of memes and buzzwords? Oh wait... I know why

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You really want to discuss the specifics and history of just the versions that make Israel look good?

[–] TheFonz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why, do the details make Israel look good? Is there a reason to shy away from having a meaningful discussion or is it better to hide behind memes and catchphrases

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

They don't. And you're the one calling everything buzzwords, memes and catchphrases now.

Whats amazing is wanting to go into the history when that makes Israel look even worse. But you do you

Finally going through your comment history I see you're nothing but a constrain. There's nothing productive from further discussion. Have a great holiday

[–] TheFonz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Par for the course. Searching for specifics or facts of a matter is not being a contrarian. It's called doing due diligence without letting bias cloud your view. We all have narratives we wish to paint. But unfortunately reality is more complicated than yapping online about how Nazzi or not Israel is. That's the difference between online virtue signaling and someone who is interested in pursuing the truth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Notice none of that is an argument or denial of how shit Israel has been it's entire history.

Even bringing up nazis.

3/10 attempt

[–] TheFonz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Notice how you can only engage at a superficial level with the topic? My money is you can't even locate Israel on a map at this point. But thanks for having an opinion on the subject. I'm not surprised as this has been the most you can get talking anything related to geopolitics on this platform.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And now insults. 1/10.

Have an argument.

I'm not surprised as this has been the most you can get talking anything related to geopolitics on this platform.

It's impressive how much you type to say jack shit and make whatever you are arguing for worse.

[–] TheFonz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's impressive how much of an opinion on a topic people can have despite not knowing jack shit. But for some reason the onus is always on the rest of us to hold your hand. And if we get into the specifics of something suddenly we're 'contrarian'.

Israel is committing genocide for sure but don't kid yourself in the narrative that hamas is some noble liberation army. It's clear you're not equipped to talk about any of this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

At what point have I expressed anything that puts hamas in a good light?

Again still just insulting.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ok now explain why Israel does not accept the deal since Hamas does accept it.

I do not have to read any history to disprove your lies. I can open the news right now.

[–] TheFonz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are correct. Israel, in the present does not accept the two state solution. Hence why I was talking about the past.

  1. Why was it rejected by PLO when it was on the table?.

  2. Show me where Hamas is open to a two state solution.

  3. What is the meaning of "from the river to the sea"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yeah those radical Palestinians, not wanting half their home cut off for colonizers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How will creating two segregated ethno-religious states help anything?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you mean? The issue of Palestine and Israel isn't ethno-religious, it's nationalism in nature. There are still Muslim Arabs in Israel especially in the north where they live peacefully with Israeli Jews.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh so the Israelis tolerate some Muslims in israel do they. Interesting.

load more comments (3 replies)