this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
18 points (95.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5393 readers
195 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I used to have a subscription to the NYTimes, which I eventually outgrew a couple years ago.
I will say that there are few columnists in the paper that I agreed with as regularly as Paul Krugman. He's kind of a rare creature, I think. Most people wildly over-estimate their own empiricism, but Krugman seems like the outlier who really does look at math and then say, "Hmm... it looks like the data says this thing I taught to hate is effective at fulfilling my goals. I guess I support that now." And he's never been a radical, which I think gives him credibility.
So good for him. I'm glad he's out there, like Casandra, calmly explaining with a chalkboard to mainstream centrists why bringing a giant wooden horse gifted by your enemies into your guarded city is very unwise. I hope it breaks through from some people.
That was a good article. I meant “still” in the sense that it shouldn’t just be an opinion. They should have given him the front page. At some point, decorum and norms have to give way to the emergency we’re experiencing. He’s respected, so maybe he can make a difference.