this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
155 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

60048 readers
3162 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
155
Fifth Circuit: Salesforce Can’t Use Section 230 To Get Out Of Sex Trafficking Case, Because It Only Provided CRM Software, Not Content Moderation (www.techdirt.com)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/technology
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As many folks here now recognize, the story about Backpage was grossly misleading. While the narrative pushed by politicians and the media was that the company was engaged in sex trafficking, the DOJ had actually commended the company for being a strong partner in the fight against sex trafficking. Indeed, the eventual takedown of Backpage days before FOSTA went into effect (which we were told was necessary to shut down Backpage) has been shown to make life more difficult for law enforcement trying to stop sex trafficking.

But I thought politicians told us the truth? /s

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mkwt 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Backpage moderated some posts, sure. But what was the role of Salesforce here besides supplying a software package?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

when I ran my own business I had a support deal with my main software vendor. Maybe something like that is being held against them?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No way, that would make software providers liable for users missing their software. It'd be like MS being on the hook for terrorism if the Taliban used Windows on a laptop to manage their stuff.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

expecting the government to act sensibly and logically is a real easy path to madness

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

Truth. But, the big problem is setting whacko precedents. Maybe a better contemporary example would be the fed going after Apple because Luigi had an iPhone. All of a sudden, software providers start monitoring their programs' users for signs they might be subject to a lawsuit.