this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
122 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39413 readers
2872 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The presidential system is the most defunct form of democracy. Direct/parliamentary democracy is way better.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems like the balances of power worked properly here, though. The president went rogue, and the rest of the government told him to get fucked.

Even a lot of parliamentary systems have presidents, with similar controls. The problem with the US is that the legislature has been enabling executive power creep for centuries. If they're already not acting in good faith, no amount of social rules will keep them in check.

[–] BangCrash -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The president shouldn't be able to go rogue in the first place

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Well, when you find out how to eliminate the human from the equation, you let me know.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Direct democracy needs to have some sort of concept of human rights enshrined in its system somehow, and make it very hard to violate, otherwise, it could get ugly. Mob rule isn't always good. It could easily lead to torches and pitchfork "justice".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And representative rule doesn’t lead to “justice” presently?

I’m so sick and tired of hearing this argument against direct democracy in that if it doesn’t solve every flaw we have today that it should be viewed skeptically.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not skeptically. Carefully. You can't just say "okay, everyone vote on the laws directly" without thinking it through. You have to guarantee everybody's rights, not just the ones who managed to overpower everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We already don’t guarantee that.

So why are you holding DD to this standard and not RD?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Because I don't want to crawl out of one shit hole only to fall into another hastily constructed one. Let's get it right. Let's learn from the past. We know how misinformation and mass propaganda manipulates people against themselves in our current system. We can act to prevent that. We know the people who start amassing more than a certain amount of wealth start becoming unstoppable. We can fix that too. We know how minority rights get trampled now. Let's put safeguards in for that too.

Like I said, let's be careful. Or the new system will get taken over by greed, hate, and fear just like any other.