this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
716 points (95.5% liked)
Bluesky
119 readers
1187 users here now
People skeeting stuff.
Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!
founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
part of my woke agenda is actually to obsolesce the language of "rights", as I believe it is a flawed notion. instead, I advocate for equality and freedom.
I agree with the idea that rights are weird. The history of rights is rooted in law. A right is enforced by a state or similar entity. Freedom can exist outside of institutional power but rights historically require it.
That said, most people who advocate for rights are not much concerned about who will enforce those rights. It's often used more as a synonym for freedom. As with all social constructs, there is no material reality behind it
..aka rights
but rights are a fiction. we can actually observe equality and freedom.
Show me an atom of equality, or a molecule of freedom. They don't exist in the universe. Just like rights, they are a lie made true by our common belief in them.
The idea of Rights is embedded in society. That embedding has a lot of value. It stops people riding roughshod over them.
you can observe equality. you can see whether people are treated equally.
rights are routinely ignored or revoked.
so you can observe the freedom in same sex marriages, but you can't observe the right to be in a same sex marriage? I don't follow, it's the same thing.
you can see whether someone is free, but i can't see a right.
If it's a right encoded in law, you can see it written down in the text of the relevant law. Freedom is no less abstract than rights.
freedom can be observed. laws don't protect rights anyway.
You can observe someone exercising their freedom exactly as much as you can observe someone exercising their rights. What you can't see is a freedom written down, unless it's in the form of legal rights. Laws don't protect freedoms any more than they protect rights. You like the word freedom, you don't like the word right. They're both abstract concepts.
I don't think laws protect freedom nor rights
Not very effectively, but it's better than not having laws protecting them.
I don't think so
No, but you also spent hours arguing with bland factual statements like "most male cows are killed for meat before adulthood", "milk is farmed because there is demand for it", and "the natural lifespan of cattle is 15-20 years", so I'm not sure your opinion carries a great deal of weight.