this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
1557 points (98.8% liked)

Antiwork

3728 readers
146 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/[email protected]

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/[email protected]


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes, she made an explicit threat towards people on a recorded zoom call.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

She told them that they were next. That is not a threat. That is a prediction.

She walked right up to the line, but the reports of her actions do not indicate she crossed it.

"Luigi Mangione allegedly killed your competitor's CEO over behavior just like this. Keep this up, and some copycat is going to do the same to you."

That's not a threat. That is an observation; a prediction. That is protected speech. And that is a perfectly reasonable interpretation of the words she is reported to have spoken.

[–] trolololol 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

People get death threats for the most silly things these days, in all sorts of ways, and nobody is going to get fined. This is all BS.

Take the families who were harassed by Alex Jones for example, they got heaps of death threats and no one was fined for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If somebody on a video call makes a death threat to me, you can bet your ass I am taking that recording to law enforcement even as someone who fears and distrusts cops. To equate that with people hiding behind screen names and no image of themselves online as they post “kill yourself” or whatever is so beyond disingenuous. There is no way I need to explain how these are different caliber threats.

You have clearly never been doxxed or on the receiving end of a credible death threat. You learn to take these things really fucking seriously.

[–] trolololol 0 points 1 day ago

You can take it seriously but I doubt law enforcement will

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Most people do not get the death threats on camera, and then have the person admit to the police they made the threat like the woman did.

The Alex Jones related threats were in fact anonymously made making it incredibly hard to verify and convict. Jones was also ordered to pay almost a billion dollars for making the original claims and spurring on the threats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I thought some of those people got caught. Maybe I'm mixing that up with Jan 6ers though.