this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
266 points (94.6% liked)

Stop Killing Games

101 readers
2 users here now

[EU] Stop Killing Games:

The grassroots movement to legislate that games be left in a playable state after they're no longer supported by the developer.

Petition

SKG Website

Milestones:

(40.03%) Petition at 400.3k.

7/7 Countries reached.

Goals:

(45.75%) of the signatures will be reached at this rate.

224 days / 32 weeks / 8 months left.

Final Day: 31/7/2025.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (35 children)

Are people actually advocating for game publishers to have to keep the servers running forever? That would seem a bit of an unreasonable ask. I think a reasonable compromise would be that if they plan to shut down the servers, the publisher should have to release the server side software.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 week ago (10 children)

No “running the servers forever” is a bad faith argument against the initiative making it seem “unreasonable”

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It's also subtly re-enforcing capital's position games need to operate on a centralised server model. I look back at many old multiplayer games where all I need to play with my friends is a local network. These days we get sold single player games that can't run under those conditions.

They aren't scared of being made to run servers forever. Quite the opposite, they are scared of us not needing them to.

[–] Resonosity 2 points 1 week ago

Why else would you want to play their new games if they can't force restricted access on your old games.

For real though, I miss games that could sync up multiplayer over LAN.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)