this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
337 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59886 readers
2488 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“It seemed doomed almost from the moment they decided to go to a sealed bid,” Judge Lopez said. “Nobody knows what anybody else is bidding,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 159 points 1 day ago (28 children)

Judge Lopez said that the bankruptcy auction failed to maximize the amount of money that the sale of Infowars should provide to Mr. Jones’s creditors, including the Sandy Hook families, in part because the bids were submitted in secret.

“It seemed doomed almost from the moment they decided to go to a sealed bid,” Judge Lopez said. “Nobody knows what anybody else is bidding,” he added.

So the problem is that it didn't maximise the potential income for the bankrupcy case?

Shouldn't that be a "oh well, sucks. but a sale is a sale" problem?

[–] danc4498 0 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Whatever gets the sandy hook families the money they deserve.

[–] spankmonkey 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

They wanted the sale to go to the Onion and not some conservative hate group more than the money. They were fully on board with taking the lower amount.

[–] Lifecoach5000 4 points 19 hours ago

There’s a legal eagle vid that explains the math:

https://youtu.be/GmDNz7irGgw?si=U3u-_vcJESrMLVdQ

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)