Hardware

732 readers

208 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 days ago by Alphane_Moon to c/hardware

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Alphane_Moon 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

For a such a price I would expect a larger Optane SSD (I am assuming you would use it for your boot/application drive).

2TB base storage is also ridiculous for such a price, although you can fit a lot of music in 2TB even if you store everything in FLAC.

[–] recklessengagement 2 points 22 hours ago

That, and how they're somehow able to take you from 2TB of additional storage to 64TB for a mere 2 grand... Something isn't adding up

[–] Cort 13 points 2 days ago

The optane is weird on multiple fronts, but what struck me was the ram. ONLY 48GB when you have dual CPUs, seems weird for something of this price.