this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
469 points (99.2% liked)
Games
32843 readers
1141 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can someone explain? How does Funko have such ability?
It's mainly a failure on the part of the register, if it's automatically banning websites based on number of reports there's a strong possibility this is going to keep happening, potentially for nefarious reasons.
This actually does happen a bit from time to time, it's a bit of a weak point in the internet infrastructure.
It's definitely a huge failure on the registrar part, but I wouldn't say "mainly", because it makes it sound like it's normal for a company to send random blanket claims in all directions just in case something sticks.
I'm sure it's not what you meant, but there definitely needs to be some sort of penalty for bad actors (including mass unsupervised automated claims).
Well it kind of was what I was getting at in a way, though distribution of fault is pretty debatable. I think the majority of fault lies with the company putting a failable automated system into production for something this, but I can't help but wonder if there is potential for abuse if this is all it takes for the registrar to delist a legitimate business. I guess I tend to come from the perspective that security is primarily on the service provider, because everyone using the service can and will either abuse or break shit in a spectacular fashion.
Penalities would be a good start I think, like you mentioned. Business sometimes can only understand the language of money after all. It's possible this is the exception to a system that functions quite well behind the scenes also.
I also appreciate the benefit of the doubt on this, it's refreshing compared to the usual internet instant rage.
It seems like it was a DMCA takedown request. Anyone can submit these to content hosters and the hoster has to follow the process, which typically means removing the content until it can be proven that it isnt violating copyright. The problem isn't the takedown request, but that it was given to itch.io's registrar instead of itch.io itself. It'd be like asking to takedown youtube from the web because someone reposted your video on it.
Unmonitored automated systems can do a lot of damage.
Although maybe register important business domains with an actual large company you've heard of and not "iwantmyname".