this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
82 points (95.6% liked)

Asklemmy

44067 readers
812 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, the way I've seen it explained is that anything over 4 can be an orgy, as long as nobody is just watching. Otherwise, it's just group sex.

However, I've also seen the argument made that 4 can be an orgy so long as everyone is involved with at least two other people at once.

Me, I say it's a small orgy when it's over 4 but under a dozen.

In this case, it was nine people. 4 dongs present. But they were all putting things into each other (if you count tongues, and I do) and mostly with more than one person, so it wasn't just group sex with enough people to count as an orgy.

And yes, I did watch for a while. It was. . . interesting. It was too weird to be arousing, what with the suddenness of it, and the location, and the utter lack of aggressive exhibitionism. Like, obviously they wanted to be seen, it was public. But it wasn't like they were paying attention to being seen, they weren't just watching people watch them. It was almost performance art tbh, just performance art with jizz.