this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2022
13 points (76.0% liked)
Games
345 readers
3 users here now
█▓▒░📀☭ g a m e s 💾⚧░▒▓█
Tag game recommendations with [rec]. Tag your critique or commentary threads with [discussion]. Both table-top and video game content is welcome! Original content or indie/DRM free material is encouraged!
Not a place for gamer gate talk or other reactionary behavior. TERFs and incels get the wall.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've definitely noticed it with grand strategy games, take this with a grain of salt but I assume that it is because these kind of games let the players live their political fantasies, which I guess it's more appealing to people who want a different kind of society than the one they live under IRL. This is all just speculation though.
I personally like these games precisely because of that reason, I like building up socialist countries in Victoria 3 because that's currently the only way for me to "have a taste" of socialism, even when it's just a bunch of pixels on screen.
Pretty much this. Anyone can have daydreams or fantasies about their ideal society, but when yours involved detailed plans about train schedules, economic policies, and realpolitiks, you have some pretty strong Opinions about how things should be run.
Think also that it depends on whether the user gets the humor. Liberty Prime, the Imperium, etc. aren't things to support what they stand for at face value, yet some do.
Like, I remember a while ago seeing a thread on reddit where some dude was saying that Fallout was a parody of communism, and not capitalism, and his argument boiled down to "when government does something bad, it's communism".