this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
233 points (100.0% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2388 readers
165 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The FDA is considering banning Red No. 3 and potentially Red No. 40, artificial dyes used in food and beverages, amid growing safety concerns.

Red No. 3, already banned in cosmetics for being carcinogenic in high doses, has faced scrutiny over links to hyperactivity and behavioral issues in children.

While the FDA maintains these dyes are safe under current guidelines, states like California and Illinois have passed laws to restrict them, potentially pressuring manufacturers to reformulate nationwide.

Critics argue the U.S. lags behind Europe in post-market chemical safety reviews.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Red No. 3, already banned in cosmetics for being carcinogenic in high doses,

I wonder how high the doses need to be to be considered harmful / carcinogenic and if there's a cumulative effect. I pretty much live on those Mio-style water flavorings, and yep, Red-40.

[โ€“] Eheran 5 points 1 week ago

Carcinogens do not have a lower threshold, it is always statistics. So where do you draw the line?

load more comments (8 replies)