this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
301 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

32173 readers
219 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right attitude, wrong solution.

Email is very much not private

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Protonmail is

Edit: At least it is if both the sender and recripient uses protonmail. Its open source so you could verify the client to make sure that the contents are encrypted. As for IP address and subject lines tho, that's up to the Protonmail company to honor your privacy, and just hope they don't betray you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Protonmail is definitely more private than google or Microsoft, but you shouldn't hold 100% trust in any provider. Ultimately your data is still on their hardware and they have control of it. Also, as others have pointed out, both sides need to be secure otherwise all that data is accessible on the other side.

You can mitigate it yourself a bit by hosting your own email server, but I highly recommend against that as its a massive headache to secure and basically every provider will reject your messages anyway.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

protonmail is CIA https://encryp.ch/blog/disturbing-facts-about-protonmail/

besides the above, their open support for regime change in China is NOT something a Taiwanese company would do. I live in Taiwan and have worked here for over a decade. Executives here try to keep their head down and just make money. They do not champion any causes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have read that blog entry and some of its references. The evidence provided for this strong claim seems to be very weak. I would not judge anything based on the listed talking points. Now, knowthing is impossible and such services are sure in the interest of governments around the world. I also want to remind people on the Swiss Crypto AG which sold compromised analog encryption machines for decades.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That user also claims Signal and Matrix are CIA and refuses to provide sources for those claims

[–] rImITywR 7 points 1 week ago

Even if you have 100% confidence in your own provider, you also need 100% confidence in every other recipients provider, which is basically impossible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The body of the messages arguably are, but the metadata is not, and that includes the subject line and the sender & recipient addresses.