Collapse

569 readers

41 users here now

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.

Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.

RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort, high volume and low relevance posts.

Related lemmys:

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

It was always about the oil (consciousnessofsheep.co.uk)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

You're definitely misunderstanding the author. There is no going back to BAU since it's over, and neither are renewable energy sources capable of sustaining an advanced technological society the fruit of which we're currently still (your mileage might vary) enjoying. For multiple reasons UK is a particularly interesting, albeit depressing, collapse case study. The other Tim (Morgan https://surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com/ ) is currently working on a SEEDS report for UK, which should turn out quite interesting. I'll be sure to post it here.

In general, I think I have a pretty good picture of what is going on, though my expectation that everybody can synthesize their own sense from the submissions here is perhaps unwarranted. Still, don't give up on Tim Watkins just yet. He really isn't saying what you think he's saying.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What is the author saying here? It sounds like he's saying that the real economy is the energy economy, and collapses in energy supply will ruin the economy whatever anyone does. I don't think that's actually true of the modern economy, since we're still burning fossil fuels with no real sign of stopping, and God help us. I think the main problem is hoarding resources by the super-wealthy. Maybe things will change as things drop back down from peak oil, but we're not at that point. We have plenty of energy and resources to feed everyone and solve our problems, for now, and the main underlying-reality threat to "the economy" is climate-change-induced crop failure, which we're actively encouraging in increasing ways every year. That's my take on what I think he is saying.

Again, that's just based on skimming. Can you summarize his point? I wasn't saying that this article was endorsing fossil fuels, although it doesn't exactly not-endorse fossil fuels. I'm just saying that I've seen more than one article from this source which fall back to that suspicious argument. Enough to notice a pattern.

To check myself, I clicked on two random articles from the top of the main page right now, and I got:

https://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2024/11/13/can-we-live-like-windy-miller/

https://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2024/11/15/inevitably/

The second is British politics stuff which I am not well-informed enough to understand, but the first is exactly what I said a lot of this source's articles were.

[–] TokenBoomer -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why degrowth is the only responsible way forward

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

What does this have to do with what we were talking about?

[–] TokenBoomer -1 points 3 months ago

Thanks for countering the misinformation, I’ve become too cynical to fight back effectively.