this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
330 points (93.9% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3578 readers
468 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NielsBohron 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

This map bothers me as they omit Lake Tahoe, which is higher than Baikal (~6,200 ft) and deeper than everything except Baikal (~1,600 ft deep)

What's the point of including all that empty space between Baikal and Titicaca when there's a world renowned lake that would be great to include

[–] credo 7 points 6 days ago

So you’re saying it’s not really special. Not the highest, not the deepest?

Sure. Throw it in!

load more comments (4 replies)