this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)
NASA
1007 readers
14 users here now
Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.
Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I guess it could have been worse?
"A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one."
Isaacman would be probably one of the best results we could have hoped for, considering the upcoming administration.
a NASA analogue to RFKJr would have been a flat earther.
That would be hilarious. A terrible admin for NASA, but hilarious.
Edit: Although come to think of it, when he started out, Bridenstine was a climate change... not "denier", but was skeptical that the cause is anthropogenic. But to his credit, he changed his opinion when presented with new data, and turned out to be a pretty good NASA admin.
Who knows, maybe a flat-earther would surprise us! The timeline we're in is already so strange...