this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
11 points (82.4% liked)

AskHistorians

713 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks 0 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Abrahamic religions were always about increasing their numbers.

So heterosexuality was forced on everyone, because that's how you get new people born into the cult, which is easier than converting a rational adult.

Everytime an Abrhamic religion ran into a new culture, they forced that rigidality onto them.

[–] PP_BOY_ 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

True but not entire. Homophobia is still very common in cultures that were never touched by Abrahamic religion like The West was.

Abrahamic religions were always about increasing their numbers.

Should read:

Early societies around the world were always about increasing their numbers.

On OP's point about homosexuality in Rome specifically, you're thinking of the Greeks. Homosexuality in Rome was taboo, except as a form of domination between ~~an owner and his slaves.~~ E: an older man and a young man he had power over

[–] AbouBenAdhem 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Homosexuality in Rome was taboo, except as a form of domination between an owner and his slaves.

More precisely, homosexual sex was seen in two distinct roles (“top” and “bottom”), and only the latter was taboo.

[–] PP_BOY_ 2 points 2 weeks ago

Eh... yes and no. It's worth acknowledging that "Roman" is a pretty big block of culture to talk about so broadly, but there were definitely more social rules to (older) males' choice of male concubine than "to be the one who penetrates." Public homosexual relationships almost always came from a place of power first and romance second (if at all).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)